PACQUIAO WAS THE POET; MARQUEZ, A MERE VERSIFIER

March 18, 2008

Right after the Marquez-Pacquiao rematch, I have been hearing and reading various post-bout analyses. Basically, there are disagreements. It is really very hard to determine the fanatic from the critic and find out the more objective diagnosis. Boxing is a sport, and just as it is guided by rules, laws and technicalities; it is also adjudged according to entertainment value. And in the case of postcolonial Philippines and Mexico, it also comes as a measure of national pride.

Since the boxing experts, foreign or local are at a disagreement, I think the decision of the three judges must prevail. No matter how scientific they are, they will always be humans and subject to a certain margin of personal bias and error. Let us not forget that the first time Marquez and Pacquiao met, the latter was robbed of victory because of a miscalculation in one of the judge’s sheet. But still, as mandated by the rules of the game, the ringside judges are the ones who have the sole power to determine the outcome of the bout in case there is no KO or TKO. That is why even if it was seen as controversial draw, the 2004 verdict prevailed.

As a writer, here’s my take on the matter. I think, similar to literary contest judges, the ringside judges also have the sole power to decide the result of the bout. They are the ‘designated experts’ for the occasion. Otherwise it would become a mere numbers game with people, experts or otherwise, casting their ballots as to who should win right after a bout. But then again, just like when readers express their opinion with regard a poem, story or novel; boxing viewers can also share their verdict and sentiments with regard the fight.

That is why I say, if it were a poetry contest, and both Pacquiao and Marques were entrants, here’s my take: Pacquiao was the poet while Marquez was a mere versifier. For one, Manny’s punches had more substance and style. Just look at his 3rd round short left-hook that sent Marquez’ back down the canvass with both his hands and feet in the air. Just look at his 10th round out-of-the-book ‘fade-away’ left hook that completely caught the schooled boxer in Marquez off-guard. Compare that with the counter-punching skills of Marquez that did as much as to keep Pacquiao at bay and at the same time score. Manny was more art than science, while Manuel was more science than art.

Now it all boils down to the ultimate purpose of boxing. You box not just to hit and score, you box to eliminate and knock the opponent down. Same with writing, it is not all about craft, you have to have something to say and send your message across. True, Marquez’ boxing skills made him score. All those scientific moves of his should have been directed to its ultimate purpose of knocking the challenger down at least once. But this did not happen. He simply used them to keep Pacquiao at bay and as the defending champion he should have done more than that.

Pacquiao is the champion because he reinvented boxing and at the same time retained the primordial purpose of a punch—to knock the opponent down.

True enough, just as there are many things about poetry that graduate school can’t teach you; there are also many things about punching that even the childhood-to-adult boxing training camps of Mexico can’t just produce. And this includes the patented and genetically specific Manny Pacquiao punch.

________________________________________________________________

During the Kantaramon at Lolo’s Bar last Saturday, March 15. The Kabulig-Bikol also invited the ABS-CBN to cover the event. This writer was one of those interviewed by reporter Jonathan Magistrado. He asked me about what can the younger Bikol writers contribute in the flourishing of Bikol literature. Almost instinctively, I responded it is information technology that we have. We can use our blogs and podcasts in pushing for regional literature.

In line with this, master fictionist Jose Dalisay, in writing about the Juliana Arejola-Fajardo Workshop and Premio Tomas Arejola in his Penman column in the Arts and Culture Section of The Philippine Star (March 17, p. G-6) likewise expressed the role of the internet in promoting regional literature. He wrote: “Our regional literatures have always had a hard time competing for space, attention, and funding with writing in English and Filipino (not to mention Harry Potter and Tom Clancy), but thankfully the Internet has evened things up a bit, and today there are a number of literary blogs devoted to the resurgence of writing in Bikol, bannered by such young writers as Rizaldy Manrique, Jason Chancoco and Kristian Cordero—previous winners all of the Arejola Prize.

And that is why we blog and can’t stop from blogging.

3 Responses to “PACQUIAO WAS THE POET; MARQUEZ, A MERE VERSIFIER”

  1. Albert said

    Hey – whats up. Thanks a bunch for the blog. I’ve been digging around for info, but there is so much out there. Google lead me here – good for you i guess! Keep up the great information. I will be coming back in a few days to see if there is updated posts.

  2. Adrian said

    Hiya … I stumbled on your oage by mistake. I was looking in Bing for PDF software that I had already purchased when I came upon your site, I have to say your page is pretty cool I just love the theme, its amazing!. I don’t have the time at the moment to totally read your site but I have bookmarked it and also will sign up for your RSS feed. I will be back in a day or two. Thanks again for a cool site.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: